Section 34 BauGB: development within a built-up area
Where no qualifying binding development plan governs the issue, section 34 BauGB can be central to development within an established built-up area.
Read articleKNOWLEDGE FOR YOUR PROJECT
Current developments and earlier guidance on German and European construction law. Browse individual articles by subject or search for a practical issue.
Where no qualifying binding development plan governs the issue, section 34 BauGB can be central to development within an established built-up area.
Read articleAn unusual design still needs to satisfy the applicable planning requirements. A proposed protective use does not itself displace those tests.
Read articleSome construction agreements can arise without a traditional signed contract, but relying on informal instructions creates avoidable uncertainty.
Read articleA useful defect notice identifies the problem, the affected work and the response requested. It also helps preserve evidence for the next step.
Read articleOne building problem can require more than one legal response. Permission to build and a right to payment answer different questions.
Read articleA contractor’s warning should explain the technical concern and its likely consequences. A generic reservation is much less useful than a specific, timely communication.
Read articleA defect remedy must be matched to the contractor’s promised work and the technical cause of the problem.
Read articleA damages claim needs a factual basis for both responsibility and amount. A large bundle of invoices does not necessarily explain what loss the alleged breach caused.
Read articleA property acquisition should test the assumptions on which the proposed building project depends.
Read articleNeighbour issues should be identified before mobilisation. A dispute may concern public-law protection, private rights or both.
Read articlePrivate construction law concerns the promises and claims connecting the employer, contractor and professional team.
Read articleThe Court of Justice’s judgment of 20 September 2018 in C-343/17 concerned the admissibility of a reference arising from a Belgian land pre-emption dispute.
Read article